| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
181. Fleet warps. - in Wormholes [original thread]
Just adding my two cents. If your goal, as stated, is to put control into the hands of individual pilots then keeping fleet warp in, in any form, is probably not going to solve your problem. EVE players are, if anything, resourceful in working ar...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.06.15 13:08:41
|
182. Sticky:[AEGIS] Fleet Warp Changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Manfred Sideous wrote: So the guy in the wormhole warps to the bookmark and WWWWWW's up. Then everyone gets fleet warped OMG THE TRAVESTY THAT THOSE EXTRA FEW SECONDS WILL CREATE. THINK OF ALL THE BELLY LENT YOU COULD HAVE PICKED IN THOSE FEW P...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.06.12 03:27:24
|
183. Star Explorers: Seeking mature wormhole players for C4 living - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Summer is coming! Get in on the action
- by Obil Que - at 2015.06.05 13:47:04
|
184. Sticky:[Carnyx] Sentry Drone Adjustments - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alundil wrote: Bouncers and Curators - sure. The optimal/damage/tracking to the gardes is a bit much, imo. Also, this is going to have some pretty negative downstream effects on non-bonused hulls. Reducing, overall, the "flavor" of ships seen o...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.21 17:38:07
|
185. Star Explorers: Seeking mature wormhole players for C4 living - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Tamra Dresden wrote: How active are you during late US TZ? That is probably our strongest TZ and my personal most active time. US CST after 11pm.
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.20 20:05:10
|
186. Star Explorers: Seeking mature wormhole players for C4 living - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Come see what we're all about
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.20 19:54:38
|
187. How would one start selling wormholes? - in Wormholes [original thread]
Amak Boma wrote: yes if it is offline then there is no forcefield on dscan but be careful on honeypotting . someone can intentionally not type password for forcefield to not activate it and may use his pos as bait. example you find a offline po...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.20 12:41:02
|
188. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fzhal wrote: Obil Que wrote: Timezone mechanics need careful consideration as well to ensure they do not devolve into station sitting for smaller corps making their "primetime" too tedious to endure. I think that somewhere one of the Devs ...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.20 12:38:24
|
189. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Soldarius wrote: I never said CCP wasn't happy with the emergent aspect of w-space or that they were trying to bring it more in-line with the original intent. Only that players are using it in a way that is not in-line with the original intent,...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.19 19:53:02
|
190. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Meque wrote: The timezone restriction is going to decrease conflict between players dramatically. Because you get so many good spontaneous off timezone fights from people while they are sleeping?
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.19 16:22:36
|
191. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fredric Wolf wrote: Obil Que wrote: Fredric Wolf wrote: Here are my thoughts on WH they were supposed to be tough to live in but also offered the best rewards for time/isk. With these changes I do not think it is going to be half as bad a...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.15 19:26:42
|
192. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: If this has been answered previously, I apologise - I'm not trying to troll here. Last I heard the contest nodes spawn across a constellation - obviously this is a nonsense concept for a WH - have we more detail on it I missed? A...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.15 19:23:41
|
193. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fredric Wolf wrote: Here are my thoughts on WH they were supposed to be tough to live in but also offered the best rewards for time/isk. With these changes I do not think it is going to be half as bad as people are making it out to be. Why shou...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.15 17:53:00
|
194. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Morn Hylund wrote: Ocean Ormand wrote: CCP frequently throws a lot of time/money at an issue and comes up with something that is not what the players want and is just unfun. CQ, minigame/spew, and industry teams are recent examples. The i...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.15 16:30:55
|
195. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Morn Hylund wrote: Obil Que wrote: All of this combined with a near-zero reward structure for your efforts does not make the entire system very appealing as a conflict mechanism. I don't get this "near-zero reward" meme. There is a big r...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.15 16:29:25
|
196. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aralyn Cormallen wrote: Sequester Risalo wrote: Sov structures are by definition a thing of large nullsec entities.These should indeed be able to defend their space during the vulnerability window. Wormhole POSes in low class wormholes ar...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.15 14:02:38
|
197. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
EnternalSoul wrote: CCP wants us to be occupying and using the system we put the XL in. Not a solo thing but a Corp level thing to keep it Occupied. That is why they do not want automated defenses but ones that you sit in there box and press f...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.14 18:44:35
|
198. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ocean Ormand wrote: If "there is no tank that can exceed a Citadel's defense" then you have to use lots of sacrificial ships - more ships then the citiadel can kill before it is reinforced - seems like a crappy mechanic to me. Correct. Thr...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.14 18:41:57
|
199. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Petrified wrote: Obil Que wrote: Petrified wrote: In and of itself, that is not a problem: people always will fly what best fits the situation. As I stated, the auto-mated defenses are not meant for those people, but for the fool who deci...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.14 18:34:29
|
200. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fzhal wrote: Obil Que wrote: It's a pretty simple calculation to beat your defenses to do a solo unattended attack. So what good are they then? That is what I said 300 posts ago... *nods* Shout it from the roof tops No automated defe...
- by Obil Que - at 2015.05.14 18:21:36
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |